That’s exactly what I said in the other thread about The Spectator article. When you have an issue (like, environmental problems), you find a solution. Solutions are never perfect, because we are humans. Having healthy meals is a a problem, if you have no money, expertise in both nutrition and cooking, and time. Huel is a solution. It’s not perfect, but it’s a good one. There maybe others for sure. But I see a growth of “opinions” where someone say “this solution has problems, so it’s no good”. But then no alternative is suggested. That’s sterile and stupid. Let’s keep the problem then. 
Also, bullshit is bullshit and nutrition as many other fields is filled by pseudoscience and gurus. One thing I love of Huel is that James Collier is professional and competent. He may be wrong in some of the decisions he made for Huel, who knows, he’s a human after all, but at least he’s not a pseudo-guru telling you to eat Huel because is a “magical natural product made from ancient japanese trees”. 