# Feed: "Huel's nutritionally complete meal is not complete" **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [April 23, 2019, 2:05pm UTC](https://discuss.huel.com/t/feed-huels-nutritionally-complete-meal-is-not-complete/13470 "2019-04-23T14:05:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 46
**Author:** ![Latestfuels](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.huel.com/latestfuels/32/5633_2.png) [@Latestfuels](https://discuss.huel.com/u/Latestfuels)\ **Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 10:54am UTC](https://discuss.huel.com/t/feed-huels-nutritionally-complete-meal-is-not-complete/13470/46 "2019-04-25T10:54:15Z")
Interesting answer you got there. From my experience with Feed. SM they tend to be very protective towards their products, and not very keen to criticism. By no means, I am suggesting this is always the case, though. In the comparison they gave to you they bring up some valid points, but they are skewed towards their read of “healthy nutrition” and what they believe to be optimal intake of nutrients. For instance: > [@butt](#): > > The recommendations in terms of a balanced diet are established in such a way that the total energy intake is distributed as follows: 50% carbohydrates, 30-35% lipids and 15-20% protein. This statement while not completely false is masking facts to their advantage. Recommendations on macronutrient intake are given in acceptable macronutrient distribution RANGE (AMDR) -NOTE: terminology varies with countries and organization. This is, a span of values that are OK for the 97% of the population. According to the European Food and Safety Agency (ESFA), the main food institution in the EU, the AMDR for the macronutrients are as follow ( **2010 summary** ): - The intake of **total carbohydrates** should range from 45 to 60% of the total energy intake for both adults and children. - A daily intake of 25 grams of **dietary fibre** is adequate for normal bowel function in adults. In addition evidence in adults shows there are health benefits associated with higher intakes of dietary fibre (e.g. reduced risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and weight maintenance). - Intakes of **fats** should range between **20 to 35%** of the total energy intake, with different values given for infants and young children taking into account their specific developmental needs. Regarding protein, one of the most recent[reports on Dietary Recommended Values by ESFA](https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2017_09_DRVs_summary_report.pdf), stated the following: - The Panel considers that the value of **0.66 g/kg body weight** per day can be accepted as the Average Requirement (AR)and the value of **0.83 g/kg body weight** per day as the Population Reference Intake (PRI) . This values are for the average adult in order to maintain muscle tissue. This recommendations are not an exception, but follow the trend of most health organizations, including WHO and US Health department. So, coming back to the original point, this figures are not set in stone. > [@butt](#): > > While Feed. meals meet these recommendations, Huel meals are a little off providing the necessary nutritional requirements recommended by European health authorities. Now, what I think the Feed. representative is trying to say is that Huel Powder’s macronutrient range is “off” the recommended. They are right, since it is below the recommended “carbohydrate” intake (45%). Another discussion would be whether this is good or bad, if it depends on the person or if it can be good to balance your diet out (since we tend to consume a lot of carbs otherwise). > [@butt](#): > > This is in complete contrast to the amount of protein that can be found in a Huel meal. Here they are more than happy to overload their “meals”. If you were to consume 4 Huel meals per day, as they recommend, then you would find yourself consuming as much three times more protein (296%) than is currently recommended. This amount of protein can be harmful to your health and could ultimately lead to kidney problems. One of the main issues it seems is the protein content in Huel. There have been some good points on why the protein recommendations might be “outdated” or should require more consideration by @Dan_Huel: > [@Dan\_Huel](#): > > That research is at least 25 years out of date. Here are two studies in the last 6 months showing that consuming high amounts of protein is not an issue. A systematic review of 28 studies and a 1 year trial on high protein diets: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383278](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383278) and [https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/3/4/62](https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/3/4/62) but here are some more articles: - Protein RDAs might need to be increased (2016) [Protein "requirements" beyond the RDA: implications for optimizing health - PubMed](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26960445) - Protein for older people to be 1 to 1.3g/kg/day(2015) [Protein Requirements and Recommendations for Older People: A Review - PubMed](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287239) - Daily protein intake to be 1.2-1.8g/kg From Examine (yes, this is but a site) [Optimal Protein Intake Guide - Examine](https://examine.com/nutrition/how-much-protein-do-you-need/) - How much protein per meal to build protein [How much protein can the body use in a single meal for muscle-building? Implications for daily protein distribution | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition | Full Text](https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-018-0215-1) There has also been some evidence showing that high protein diets cause no harm in healthy kidneys: - [A High Protein Diet Has No Harmful Effects: A One-Year Crossover Study in Resistance-Trained Males - PubMed](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27807480) However, the opposite is true for “damaged” kidneys: - [Are high-protein, vegetable-based diets safe for kidney function? A review of the literature - PubMed](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17383270) And some feel that more research about the whole topic is necessary: - [High-protein diets and renal health - PubMed](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25091135) One thing is clear, the ESFA guidelines are safe, but more active individuals will require higher protein content. For most (assuming healthy conditions), even up to 2g/kg of bodyweight seem safe. The “upper limit” of when high protein is too much is “unclear”. As for this point: > [@vanquish](#): > > I’ve read on many bodybuilding websites that 2 boundaries should not been crossed: the “2g per kg” and the 1 to 1.5g fat per kg The first (if its about protein) does not seem to match the literature. Up to 2.2g/kg or more (depending activity levels) seem “optimal” [How much protein can the body use in a single meal for muscle-building? Implications for daily protein distribution | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition | Full Text](https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-018-0215-1). Not sure about the fat, but I think similarly to protein it depends on goals and bodytype. I think for people with specific goals in mind with very high dietary restrictions (such as bodybuilding), Huel might not be optimal but good. From their statement it seems that they believe all their products are nutritionally superior to Huel’s (hard task to do this judgement in most circumstances); but even Feed has products with “suboptimal” ingredients and nutritional values (such as “crunchy” or the chocolate spread). Besides the nutritional argument where I agree with @JamesCollier > [@JamesCollier](#): > > Is it the perfect balance? impossible to answer - there is no ‘perfect balance’ for all individuals the point about the products > [@butt](#): > > Contrary to its slogan, Huel’s “Nutritionally Complete Food” is, in fact, not complete. Indeed, the brand offers “meals” between 400/500kcal in its powdered form and 250kcal for its bars. Although needs differ from one individual to another, the recommendations in terms of daily energy intake are set at 2000kcal. Therefore you’d have to have 5 Huel powdered meals or 8 Huel bars per day to reach this value. is very weak: - You can easily engineer a 600kcal meal, or a 300kcal meal or a 1000kcal shake just by adding more or less g of Huel. Same with Feed. Recommended servings are just that, guidelines. I personally enjoy a ~400kcal breakfast +coffee. - About the bars, it has been discussed in other threads ([Huel Bar v3.0 now available - improved texture - #12 by ryanhellyer](https://discuss.huel.com/t/huel-bar-v3-0-now-available-improved-texture/12119/12)) that some would prefer a bigger bar (like Feed and other brand’s). It is personal preference whether you use the bars to snack or as a meal; or it will depend on your dietary requirements. Huel has made a bet for 250kcal bars. Whether you disagree or not is up to you. Must say, I enjoy the taste of Feed. bars. (opinion that others seem to share @ChristinaT - Also, as a side note, I feel like the bars (both brands and others) tend to be nutritionally weaker to powders due to limitations in manufacturing them. > [@butt](#): > > Additionally, our recipes differ drastically and we offer a range of various formats. This is one of Feed.'s main strengths; the variety on flavours, products and the taste. To other points in this thread: > [@vanquish](#): > > Why is huel the only one putting that much protein in their food? There are other brands with similar or higher protein % in some of their products: - Jake Light - Queal Athletic (slightly lower) - Powdermatter (v small company) - Anapur (slightly lower) - Athlete Fuel by SBF etc But, yes, Huel is the main brand with that much protein. Overall, there must be said that > [@JamesCollier](#): > > Feed have some good products and, like most other complete food brands, +1 > [@ChristinaT](#): > > First rule of marketing: Never make negative statements about the competition (especially if you can’t back them up with proof or science). Always state what is positive about your own product (if that in itself is not enough to sell your product, then the product needs improving!) Not sure if first rule or not, but I agree that Guerrila marketing can backfire, and personally I prefer to hype each other rather than undermine. Market is big, there are different niches and people with different taste and needs. Similar to some people buy Nikes, others prefer Addidas trainers and the climbers might favour some specialist brands. --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.huel.com/t/feed-huels-nutritionally-complete-meal-is-not-complete/13470)._