# Slight Change to Huel v2.2 Formula **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [September 25, 2017, 4:32pm UTC](https://discuss.huel.com/t/slight-change-to-huel-v2-2-formula/7224 "2017-09-25T16:32:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![eldrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c4cdca/32.png) [@eldrin](https://discuss.huel.com/u/eldrin)\ **Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 1:43pm UTC](https://discuss.huel.com/t/slight-change-to-huel-v2-2-formula/7224/17 "2017-09-27T13:43:43Z")
> [@JamesCollier](#): > > In addition to this small ingredient change, there are changes to the values of some of the minerals, most notably iron and zinc. The reason for these value changes is we are now using more robust data. Iron per 100g was previously listed as **13.9**. Now it is listed as **7.9**. Zinc per 100g was previously listed as **2.5**. Now it is listed as **4.0**. So, the previously inaccurate figures weren’t just slightly inaccurate – they were wildly inaccurate by almost a factor of 2. How can anything on the label be trusted? Anything on the label could be **half** as much as specified or **double** as much as specified, based on the robustness of your data up until now. --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.huel.com/t/slight-change-to-huel-v2-2-formula/7224)._