Huel with milk powder

[Bee]

Totally inappropriate post @Argon18

[hunzas]

When trolls go bad.

[Argon18]

@Bee nah. This thread shows how obnoxious “ethical” vegans are. Just look at hunzas replies.

Heck I’d rather listen to a Jesus freak with a bullhorn standing on a street corner over someone like hunzas

[hunzas]

What a ridiculous argument. I’m obnoxious whether an ethical vegan or not. It’s like saying people who wear glasses are child molesters because Rolf Harris was. Do you know him?

[himji]

Let’s not feed this troll and let an admin come and sort it out

[hunzas]

Sorry. I had a quiet few minutes so thought I’d try to reason with it.

[anon10145348]

In his defense. There is some disingenuity, hypocrisy as well as double standards here.
“Sometimes a speaker or writer uses a fallacy intentionally. In any context, including academic debate, a conversation among friends, political discourse, advertising, or for comedic purposes, the arguer may use fallacious reasoning to try to persuade the listener or reader, by means other than offering relevant evidence, that the conclusion is true.”
“Insulting someone’s character (argumentum ad hominem)”

@hunzas

I expect @interpolo is the sort of person who thinks regressive steps like roe v wade in the US supreme court yesterday is a good thing.

@Darrenbryan10

Someone’s been on the wacky backy I think!

There are some people on here who bring politics into the conversation as well. If the admin decides to reprimands Argon18 then so should that person be put on cooldown as well in all fairness along with the other ones for not contributing to a positive forum experience who resort to unpleasant behavior, insults and attempting to instigate a debate.
However I do not expect that to happen as the world is often not a fair place.

Here I summed up some of the unpleasantries

@Coup

You must be completely deaf

@Coup

You really are deaf as a post and the irony is you are the person trying to impose your ideals onto others.

@hunzas

I expect @interpolo is the sort of person who thinks regressive steps like roe v wade in the US supreme court yesterday is a good thing.

@Darrenbryan10

Someone’s been on the wacky backy I think!

@epicure

Maybe there are people who are genuinely ignorant, alongside those who are wilfully deceived, or just too self-indulgent to care.

@Coup

his over inflated opinion

And I could go on however this should suffice.

[hunzas]

@anon10145348

I do not expect that to happen as the world is often not a fair place.

If the world was a fair place, cows wouldn’t be raped so that humans can steal their milk and kill their children, and this thread would never have existed. Like you say it isn’t a fair place.

[Coup]

@anon10145348

attempting to instigate a debate

Oh my life. It’s a forum pal that’s generally how they work.
I also stand by my comments. You completely ignored (as in “throw a deaf one”) the key point that Huel is a vegan company and has been from the start and your suggestion is not vegan.

[Patricius]

What the 'meat paradox' reveals about moral decision making

[Dan_Huel]

@Tim_Huel

With this in mind, please recognise that many here on this forum are not vegan, including myself, and we must respect this. If both sides cannot, I will need to close this thread before it get’s out of hand.

Tim has already mentioned this. I’m not even going to engage or acknowledge the conversation since his message.

May I remind you all of some of the community guidelines that have been broken:

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree -

Please avoid:

• Name-calling.
• Ad hominem attacks.
• Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content.

Always Be Civil

Nothing sabotages a healthy conversation like rudeness:

• Be civil. Don’t post anything that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, or hate speech.