I have spent months researching these topics as part of my job and prior to that my education. The ease with which I’m able to send you sources is because I have a large number of these saved in my bookmarks from that very research. You have demonstrated no ability to cite any sources whatsoever.
Some very select quotations there.
Regarding study 1, a control group would consist of a group of people consuming the same diet they ate previously as it isn’t being tested against any alternative claim. No control group here is required as it is a test against their previous diet, so simply analysing changes is sufficient (admittedly this assumes they weren’t already losing weight before the study, but bearing in mind the tests performed to check various bodily functions, this would have been evident. The fact that significant reductions were seen in BMI and LDL cholesterol (with increases in HDL cholesterol) shows that it was a result of this diet.
Regarding study 2, the full conclusion is as follows “Despite performance decrements and some negative experiences, athletes were keen to pursue a modified low-carbohydrate, high-fat eating style moving forward due to the unexpected health benefits they experienced”. Strange that there were unexpected health benefits for a diet you’re claiming is extremely dangerous. Also, “Mean body weight was reduced by 4 kg ± SD 3.1” - strange there was weight loss at all if your argument that fat just leads to weight gain is correct. Finally, “Each athlete reported experiencing enhanced well-being, included improved recovery, improvements in skin conditions and reduced inflammation” specifies the health benefits mentioned in the conclusion. So yes, in a relatively short duration study, some performance decrease was noted, but there were also massive and numerous health benefits, with the athletes involved being keen to continue with the diet.
Third study I mainly quoted so you could have a look at the mechanisms of fat metabolism which you deny are real. However it does include some figures, so I suggest you pay attention.
Why is it insane? You haven’t given anything except easily disprovable assertions.
You said there were no success stories, I pointed you to a subreddit with over half a million subscribers and numerous success stories in it. Are you suggesting these people are all shills for “big keto”? That’s absurd, and you know it. Success stories are always going to be anecdotal anyway, so I’m really not sure what you were after.
No, I’m saying that excess carb intake can not all be released harmlessly as heat as when we see excess carb intakes released as heat, as is the case with DNP, people die of hyperthermia. I really don’t get how you misinterpreted that badly.
So… you accept that low insulin levels help break down fat? It seems we’re getting somewhere!
I do. I’ve lost 30kg in the past year. Thanks for the well wishes 
No, people consume less because they’re less hungry because the expression of the hormone ghrelin is decreased when on a ketogenic diet - ghrelin makes you feel hungry and is largely responsible for hunger pangs, which is what prevents a lot of people successfully losing weight on other diets. It is nothing to do with the quality of the food (which, by the way, is extremely high - various meats, fish, vegetables and berries are a focal point of the keto diet).